sister-hood is currently on hiatus whilst we work on our relaunch. The site will still be available for your reading pleasure.
We'd like to thank all of our readers and contributors for their support over the years and look forward to coming back bigger, better and stronger.
Sign up to our mailing list for all future updates here.
Angels, murderers and worshippers
How are young people to make sense of the media response to Christchurch?
Words matter. So why are media studies being stripped from our English curriculum just when our young people need it most?
An ‘angelic boy’: this is how the Daily Mirror described the murderer of fifty worshippers in a mosque in Christchurch, New Zealand. This text was placed alongside a picture of the killer at a young age held in the arms of his father. The connotations of the word ‘angelic’ are godly, holy, and heavenly. These are far removed from the killer’s actions.
I do not recall seeing any baby pictures of Shamima Begum, the young British Muslim woman who has been stripped of her citizenship. I did see one tabloid paper call her baby a ‘Jihadi Baby’.
Language is incredibly powerful. The people killed were not a number. They were people that went to congregate and pray on a Friday. They were killed when they were at their most vulnerable, in thought, meditation and prayer. These people were human beings. They were mothers, fathers, and daughters and sons. The murderer as a child is featured, along with his father, usurping the front page. The victims have been erased; the murderer has become the victim.
Images and words take on new significance when terrorist attacks, like this Christchurch mosque massacre, happen. They connote how we think about those who threaten our way of life, our security, and our pride in living in diverse societies where people of all backgrounds live together and respect each other.
There is a reason why Brenton Tarrant, like Anders Breivik, wrote a 74 page manifesto before committing mass murder. Words matter.
As an English teacher I am completely aware of how powerful language can be. As a person that analyses language all day every day, I understand that with great power comes great responsibility. We need to teach students how to actively critique and analyse text in the media and in all its forms; be it within the print media, or television, or Facebook and online platforms and websites. Our young people need to be able to discern the difference between fact, fiction and pure rhetoric. It is essential for them to be able to recognise propaganda for what it is. They need to be able to question it and counter it at every given opportunity.
In the new specifications from the Department of Education, the Media Analysis piece of coursework has been removed from the English curriculum. In the previous curriculum, students needed to prepare and write a piece of work – as coursework or a controlled assessment – consisting of a detailed and thorough analytical analysis of moving image or print text.
It taught them to think critically about what they were reading or listening to in the media. This task is now absent from the current English curriculum. In an age where our phones convey our all our media, from news to entertainment, the diminution of the importance given to critical reading and thinking skills is grossly negligent. With the speed and ease with which we now consume information, our in-built filtering system – our critical analytical skills – are more important than ever. And they are just as important to learn and apply in the classroom as they are in the newsroom.
The murders of the men, women and children in Christchurch in New Zealand occurred due to right-wing rhetoric which has been given a glaringly overt platform on a global level across social media. We owe it to their memory to tackle its presence online… and to inoculate our children against it through education.
A version of this post was first published on openDemocracy and has been reproduced with permission and under the CC BY 4.0 licence.